QA & Delivery Quality View
Testing coverage, defect trends, automation metrics, and delivery quality scores across UAT and N2P environments
Full Delivery Chain
UAT Environment Metrics
Stories for Testing
130
Received by QA
Scenarios Created
412
Test scenarios written
Scenarios Automated
287
69.7% automation rate
Regression Test Runs
18
Regression cycles run
Reported Issues - UAT
38
Total UAT defects
Functionality Miss - UAT
6
Critical misses in UAT
Bugs Injected - UAT
14
New bugs from release
Delivery Quality - UAT
76.4%
Weighted quality score
N2P Environment Metrics
Reported Issues - N2P
12
Total N2P defects
Functionality Miss - N2P
3
Misses in N2P
Bugs Injected - N2P
5
Bugs found in N2P
Delivery Quality - N2P
83.1%
N2P quality score
Calculated KPIs
Test Scenario Coverage
3.17x
412 scenarios / 130 stories
Test Automation Coverage
69.7%
287 / 412 scenarios
UAT Defect Density
0.29
38 defects / 130 stories
N2P Defect Density
0.09
12 defects / 130 stories
Defect Leakage
24.0%
(12+0) / (38+12) total
Functionality Miss Rate
6.9%
9 misses / 130 stories
Bug Injection Rate
14.6%
19 bugs / 130 delivered
Delivery Quality Score
79.8%
Weighted composite score
QA Funnel
Stories received → scenarios → automated → UAT tested → N2P passed
Test Scenario Coverage
Stories tested vs scenarios created vs automated — monthly trend
Automation Coverage Trend
Automated scenarios % vs 70% target — monthly rolling
UAT Defect Trend
Reported issues, functionality misses, and bugs injected in UAT
N2P Defect Trend
Reported issues, functionality misses, and bugs injected in N2P
Functionality Miss Trend
UAT and N2P functionality misses — monthly comparison
Bugs Injected Trend
Bugs introduced by release in UAT and N2P with injection rate %
Defect Leakage Chart
N2P + post-live defects / total defects vs 20% target
Delivery Quality Scorecard
Composite quality metrics across UAT and N2P — targets and status
| Metric | UAT | N2P | Target | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delivery Quality Score | 76.4% | 83.1% | 85% | ⚠ Near Target |
| Test Scenario Coverage | 3.17x | 3.17x | 3.0x | ✓ On Track |
| Automation Coverage | 69.7% | 69.7% | 70% | ⚠ Near Target |
| Defect Density | 0.29 | 0.09 | 0.20 | ⚠ Near Target |
| Defect Leakage | 24.0% | — | 20% | ✗ Below Target |
| Functionality Miss Rate | 4.6% | 2.3% | 3% | ✗ Below Target |
| Bug Injection Rate | 10.8% | 3.8% | 10% | ⚠ Near Target |
| Regression Test Runs | 18 | 18 | ≥15 | ✓ On Track |
Calculated KPI Definitions
Formulas used to derive each quality metric
Test Scenario Coverage
Scenarios Created ÷ Stories Received for Testing
Test Automation Coverage
Automated Scenarios ÷ Total Scenarios Created
UAT Defect Density
UAT Defects ÷ User Stories Tested
N2P Defect Density
N2P Defects ÷ User Stories Tested
Defect Leakage
(N2P Defects + Post-Live Defects) ÷ Total Defects
Functionality Miss Rate
Functionality Misses ÷ User Stories Tested
Bug Injection Rate
Bugs Injected ÷ User Stories Delivered
Delivery Quality Score
Weighted score: severity + coverage + leakage + automation